| Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity | |
| GHSA-r4xh-jqrq-34v2 | |
| GHSA-wq5f-xc86-pv6w | |
| Incomplete Blacklist | |
| Arbitrary Code Injection | |
| GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6 | |
| Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input | |
| Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output | |
| CVE-2026-90711 | |
| GHSA-6688-9rhm-gjv2 | |
| CVE-2026-74866 | |
| GHSA-jggr-w7fw-pc2j | |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') | |
| Resource Exhaustion | |
| Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity | |
| Arbitrary Code Injection | |
| Protection Mechanism Failure | |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') | |
| Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') | |
| Arbitrary Code Injection | |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') | |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') | |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | |
| Resource Exhaustion | |
| Resource Exhaustion | |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') | |
| Resource Exhaustion | |
| Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') | |
| GHSA-p98j-92pf-mc4p | |
| Resource Exhaustion | |
| CVE-2026-19484 | |
| CVE-2026-19481 | |
| Improper Certificate Validation | |
| Information Exposure Through Server Error Message | |
| Cross-site Scripting (XSS) | |
| Algorithmic Complexity | |
| CVE-2026-18540 | |
| CVE-2026-84933 | |
| CVE-2026-84961 | |
| CVE-2026-85008 | |
| Insufficient Comparison | |
| CVE-2026-85014 | |
| GHSA-g57g-f23g-4646 | |
| CVE-2026-84947 | |
| Insufficient Comparison | |
| CVE-2026-18149 | |
| Resource Exhaustion | |
| GHSA-v53p-9fqp-m79j | |
| CVE-2026-86472 | |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | |
| CVE-2026-19534 | |
| CVE-2026-84890 | |
| GHSA-8vvx-rff5-p5rq | |
| CVE-2026-84292 | |
| GHSA-6vj9-mwq6-2f5v | |
| CVE-2026-84394 | |
| CVE-2026-85024 | |
| Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') | |
| Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') | |
| GHSA-2x7j-588g-ccc2 | |
| GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp | |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') | |
| GHSA-cc9r-2j5m-2m83 | |
| GHSA-8m3c-c648-2xjj | |
| Unchecked Input for Loop Condition | |
| HTTP Request Smuggling | |
| GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c | |
| Resource Exhaustion | |
| Directory Traversal | |
| Directory Traversal | |
| Resource Exhaustion | |
| CVE-2026-45819 | |
| CVE-2026-75899 | |
| CVE-2026-82417 | |
| CVE-2026-75975 | |
| GHSA-frvp-7c67-39w9 | |
| Algorithmic Complexity | |
| CVE-2026-75931 | |
| CVE-2026-76172 | |
| CVE-2026-82562 | |
| Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity | |
| Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session | |
| Information Exposure | |
| CVE-2026-45820 | |
| GHSA-p498-v437-472g | |
| Uncaught Exception | |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling | |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') | |
| Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') | |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') | |
| Arbitrary Code Injection | |
| Unchecked Input for Loop Condition | |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') | |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | |
| Information Exposure | |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data | |
| GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj | |
| GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7 | |
| Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') | |
| Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') | |
| GHSA-f88m-g3jw-g9cj | |
| Directory Traversal | |
| CVE-2026-14643 | |
| Improper Input Validation | |
| CVE-2026-13697 | |
| CVE-2026-16729 | |
| Improper Input Validation | |
| CVE-2026-16728 | |
| CVE-2026-18446 | |
| CVE-2026-15157 | |
| Improper Input Validation | |
| Resource Exhaustion | |
| CVE-2026-14257 | |