Homepage

wireshark-gnome

Report a new vulnerability Found a mistake?

Direct Vulnerabilities

Known vulnerabilities in the wireshark-gnome package. This does not include vulnerabilities belonging to this package’s dependencies.

Fix vulnerabilities automatically

Snyk's AI Trust Platform automatically finds the best upgrade path and integrates with your development workflows. Secure your code at zero cost.

Fix for free
VulnerabilityVulnerable Version
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-7.0.1.el5_11
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-7.0.1.el5_11
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-7.0.1.el5_11
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-7.0.1.el5_11
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-7.0.1.el5_11
  • M
CVE-2014-6421

<0:1.0.15-7.0.1.el5_11
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-7.0.1.el5_11
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-7.0.1.el5_11
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-7.0.1.el5_11
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-6.0.1.el5_10
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
CVE-2012-0042

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
CVE-2011-1958

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-5.0.1.el5
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_6.4
  • M
CVE-2011-1143

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_6.4
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_6.4
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_6.4
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_6.4
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_6.4
  • M
CVE-2010-2283

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_5.1
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_5.1
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_6.4
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_5.3
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_5.3
  • M
CVE-2009-4377

<0:1.0.11-1.0.1.el5_5.5
  • M
CVE-2009-2563

<0:1.0.11-1.0.1.el5_5.5
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_5.1
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_5.1
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_5.1
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.15-1.0.1.el5_5.1
  • M
CVE-2009-2562

<0:1.0.11-1.0.1.el5_5.5
  • M
CVE-2009-2560

<0:1.0.11-1.0.1.el5_5.5
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.11-1.0.1.el5_5.5
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:1.0.11-1.0.1.el5_5.5
  • M
CVE-2009-3550

<0:1.0.11-1.0.1.el5_5.5
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
CVE-2009-1829

<0:1.0.8-1.0.1.el5_3.1
  • M
CVE-2009-1269

<0:1.0.8-1.0.1.el5_3.1
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.8-1.0.1.el5_3.1
  • M
Use of Externally-Controlled Format String

<0:1.0.8-1.0.1.el5_3.1
  • M
CVE-2008-1070

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.6-2.0.1.el5_3
  • M
CVE-2008-1563

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
CVE-2008-1072

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
CVE-2008-1561

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Information Exposure

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Improper Input Validation

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Information Exposure

<0:1.0.3-4.0.1.el5_2
  • L
Improper Input Validation

<0:0.99.6-1.el5.0.1
  • L
CVE-2007-3392

<0:0.99.6-1.el5.0.1
  • M
CVE-2007-6450

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Access Restriction Bypass

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
CVE-2007-6116

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
CVE-2007-6117

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
CVE-2007-6118

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
CVE-2007-6119

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Resource Management Errors

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Numeric Errors

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
Out-of-Bounds

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • M
CVE-2007-6111

<0:0.99.7-1.el5.0.1
  • L
CVE-2007-3390

<0:0.99.6-1.el5.0.1
  • L
Improper Input Validation

<0:0.99.6-1.el5.0.1
  • L
CVE-2007-3393

<0:0.99.6-1.el5.0.1
  • L
CVE-2007-0457

<0:0.99.5-1.el5.0.1
  • L
CVE-2007-0456

<0:0.99.5-1.el5.0.1
  • L
CVE-2007-0458

<0:0.99.5-1.el5.0.1
  • L
CVE-2007-0459

<0:0.99.5-1.el5.0.1