Out-of-bounds Write Affecting openssl-libs package, versions <1:3.0.1-43.el9_0
Threat Intelligence
Do your applications use this vulnerable package?
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applications- Snyk ID SNYK-ALMALINUX9-OPENSSLLIBS-5634177
- published 28 May 2023
- disclosed 1 Nov 2022
Introduced: 1 Nov 2022
CVE-2022-3602 Open this link in a new tabHow to fix?
Upgrade AlmaLinux:9
openssl-libs
to version 1:3.0.1-43.el9_0 or higher.
This issue was patched in ALSA-2022:7288
.
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl-libs
package and not the openssl-libs
package as distributed by AlmaLinux
.
See How to fix?
for AlmaLinux:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6).
References
- https://errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2022-7288.html
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3602
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:7288
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fe3b639dc19b325846f4f6801f2f4604f56e3de3
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DWP23EZYOBDJQP7HP4YU7W2ABU2YDITS/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/63YRPWPUSX3MBHNPIEJZDKQT6YA7UF6S/
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169687/OpenSSL-Security-Advisory-20221101.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/15
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/16
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/17
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/18
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/19
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/20
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/21
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/24
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/11
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/12
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/13
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/14
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/15
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/7
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/9
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/11
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/7
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/9
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fe3b639dc19b325846f4f6801f2f4604f56e3de3
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/63YRPWPUSX3MBHNPIEJZDKQT6YA7UF6S/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DWP23EZYOBDJQP7HP4YU7W2ABU2YDITS/
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0023
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202211-01
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221102-0001/
- https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-W9sdCc2a
- https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/794340
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221101.txt