Missing Lock Check Affecting libperf package, versions *
Threat Intelligence
The probability is the direct output of the EPSS model, and conveys an overall sense of the threat of exploitation in the wild. The percentile measures the EPSS probability relative to all known EPSS scores. Note: This data is updated daily, relying on the latest available EPSS model version. Check out the EPSS documentation for more details.
Do your applications use this vulnerable package?
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applications- Snyk IDSNYK-CENTOS10-LIBPERF-15212958
- published5 Feb 2026
- disclosed4 Feb 2026
Introduced: 4 Feb 2026
CVE-2026-23045 (opens in a new tab)How to fix?
There is no fixed version for Centos:10 libperf.
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream libperf package and not the libperf package as distributed by Centos.
See How to fix? for Centos:10 relevant fixed versions and status.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/ena: fix missing lock when update devlink params
Fix assert lock warning while calling devl_param_driverinit_value_set() in ena.
WARNING: net/devlink/core.c:261 at devl_assert_locked+0x62/0x90, CPU#0: kworker/0:0/9 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.19.0-rc2+ #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: Amazon EC2 m8i-flex.4xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 10/16/2017 Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn RIP: 0010:devl_assert_locked+0x62/0x90
Call Trace: <TASK> devl_param_driverinit_value_set+0x15/0x1c0 ena_devlink_alloc+0x18c/0x220 [ena] ? __pfx_ena_devlink_alloc+0x10/0x10 [ena] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x18/0x140 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x8c/0x130 ? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x5d/0x80 ? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x80 ? devm_ioremap_wc+0x9a/0xd0 ena_probe+0x4d2/0x1b20 [ena] ? __lock_acquire+0x56a/0xbd0 ? __pfx_ena_probe+0x10/0x10 [ena] ? local_clock+0x15/0x30 ? __lock_release.isra.0+0x1c9/0x340 ? mark_held_locks+0x40/0x70 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x92/0x170 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x18/0x140 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x8c/0x130 ? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x5d/0x80 ? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x80 ? __pfx_ena_probe+0x10/0x10 [ena] ...... </TASK>