CVE-2025-38710 Affecting python-perf package, versions *


Severity

Recommended
medium

Based on CentOS security rating.

Do your applications use this vulnerable package?

In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.

Test your applications
  • Snyk IDSNYK-CENTOS6-PYTHONPERF-12497594
  • published5 Sept 2025
  • disclosed4 Sept 2025

Introduced: 4 Sep 2025

NewCVE-2025-38710  (opens in a new tab)

How to fix?

There is no fixed version for Centos:6 python-perf.

NVD Description

Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream python-perf package and not the python-perf package as distributed by Centos. See How to fix? for Centos:6 relevant fixed versions and status.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

gfs2: Validate i_depth for exhash directories

A fuzzer test introduced corruption that ends up with a depth of 0 in dir_e_read(), causing an undefined shift by 32 at:

index = hash >> (32 - dip->i_depth);

As calculated in an open-coded way in dir_make_exhash(), the minimum depth for an exhash directory is ilog2(sdp->sd_hash_ptrs) and 0 is invalid as sdp->sd_hash_ptrs is fixed as sdp->bsize / 16 at mount time.

So we can avoid the undefined behaviour by checking for depth values lower than the minimum in gfs2_dinode_in(). Values greater than the maximum are already being checked for there.

Also switch the calculation in dir_make_exhash() to use ilog2() to clarify how the depth is calculated.

Tested with the syzkaller repro.c and xfstests '-g quick'.

CVSS Base Scores

version 3.1