Use After Free Affecting kernel-abi-whitelists package, versions *
Threat Intelligence
Do your applications use this vulnerable package?
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applications- Snyk ID SNYK-CENTOS7-KERNELABIWHITELISTS-7077768
- published 23 May 2024
- disclosed 21 May 2024
Introduced: 21 May 2024
CVE-2023-52854 Open this link in a new tabHow to fix?
There is no fixed version for Centos:7
kernel-abi-whitelists
.
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream kernel-abi-whitelists
package and not the kernel-abi-whitelists
package as distributed by Centos
.
See How to fix?
for Centos:7
relevant fixed versions and status.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
padata: Fix refcnt handling in padata_free_shell()
In a high-load arm64 environment, the pcrypt_aead01 test in LTP can lead to system UAF (Use-After-Free) issues. Due to the lengthy analysis of the pcrypt_aead01 function call, I'll describe the problem scenario using a simplified model:
Suppose there's a user of padata named user_function
that adheres to
the padata requirement of calling padata_free_shell
after serial()
has been invoked, as demonstrated in the following code:
struct request {
struct padata_priv padata;
struct completion *done;
};
void parallel(struct padata_priv *padata) {
do_something();
}
void serial(struct padata_priv *padata) {
struct request *request = container_of(padata,
struct request,
padata);
complete(request->done);
}
void user_function() {
DECLARE_COMPLETION(done)
padata->parallel = parallel;
padata->serial = serial;
padata_do_parallel();
wait_for_completion(&done);
padata_free_shell();
}
In the corresponding padata.c file, there's the following code:
static void padata_serial_worker(struct work_struct *serial_work) {
...
cnt = 0;
while (!list_empty(&local_list)) {
...
padata->serial(padata);
cnt++;
}
local_bh_enable();
if (refcount_sub_and_test(cnt, &pd->refcnt))
padata_free_pd(pd);
}
Because of the high system load and the accumulation of unexecuted
softirq at this moment, local_bh_enable()
in padata takes longer
to execute than usual. Subsequently, when accessing pd->refcnt
,
pd
has already been released by padata_free_shell()
, resulting
in a UAF issue with pd->refcnt
.
The fix is straightforward: add refcount_dec_and_test
before calling
padata_free_pd
in padata_free_shell
.
References
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-52854
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0dd34a7ad395dbcf6ae60e48e9786050e25b9bc5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1734a79e951914f1db2c65e635012a35db1c674b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e901bcb8af19416b65f5063a4af7996e5a51d7f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41aad9d6953984d134fc50f631f24ef476875d4d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ddc21e317b360c3444de3023bcc83b85fabae2f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c7c26d0ef5d20f00dbb2ae3befcabbe0efa77275