NULL Pointer Dereference Affecting kernel-abi-whitelists package, versions *
Threat Intelligence
Do your applications use this vulnerable package?
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applications- Snyk ID SNYK-CENTOS7-KERNELABIWHITELISTS-7810807
- published 22 Aug 2024
- disclosed 21 Aug 2024
Introduced: 21 Aug 2024
CVE-2023-52909 Open this link in a new tabHow to fix?
There is no fixed version for Centos:7
kernel-abi-whitelists
.
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream kernel-abi-whitelists
package and not the kernel-abi-whitelists
package as distributed by Centos
.
See How to fix?
for Centos:7
relevant fixed versions and status.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfsd: fix handling of cached open files in nfsd4_open codepath
Commit fb70bf124b05 ("NFSD: Instantiate a struct file when creating a regular NFSv4 file") added the ability to cache an open fd over a compound. There are a couple of problems with the way this currently works:
It's racy, as a newly-created nfsd_file can end up with its PENDING bit cleared while the nf is hashed, and the nf_file pointer is still zeroed out. Other tasks can find it in this state and they expect to see a valid nf_file, and can oops if nf_file is NULL.
Also, there is no guarantee that we'll end up creating a new nfsd_file if one is already in the hash. If an extant entry is in the hash with a valid nf_file, nfs4_get_vfs_file will clobber its nf_file pointer with the value of op_file and the old nf_file will leak.
Fix both issues by making a new nfsd_file_acquirei_opened variant that takes an optional file pointer. If one is present when this is called, we'll take a new reference to it instead of trying to open the file. If the nfsd_file already has a valid nf_file, we'll just ignore the optional file and pass the nfsd_file back as-is.
Also rework the tracepoints a bit to allow for an "opened" variant and don't try to avoid counting acquisitions in the case where we already have a cached open file.
References
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-52909
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b3a551fa58b4da941efeb209b3770868e2eddd7
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b778361998d6c6356b8d2fc7ddf025fb3224654
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45c08a752982116f3287afcd1bd9c50f4fab0c28
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/973acfdfe90c8a4e58ade97ff0653a498531ff2e