Improper Access Control Affecting sudo package, versions <0:1.8.29-5.el8


Severity

Recommended
medium

Based on CentOS security rating.

Threat Intelligence

EPSS
0.76% (82nd percentile)

Do your applications use this vulnerable package?

In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.

Test your applications

Snyk Learn

Learn about Improper Access Control vulnerabilities in an interactive lesson.

Start learning
  • Snyk IDSNYK-CENTOS8-SUDO-2039548
  • published26 Jul 2021
  • disclosed19 Dec 2019

Introduced: 19 Dec 2019

CVE-2019-19234  (opens in a new tab)
CWE-284  (opens in a new tab)

How to fix?

Upgrade Centos:8 sudo to version 0:1.8.29-5.el8 or higher.

NVD Description

Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream sudo package and not the sudo package as distributed by Centos. See How to fix? for Centos:8 relevant fixed versions and status.

In Sudo through 1.8.29, the fact that a user has been blocked (e.g., by using the ! character in the shadow file instead of a password hash) is not considered, allowing an attacker (who has access to a Runas ALL sudoer account) to impersonate any blocked user. NOTE: The software maintainer believes that this CVE is not valid. Disabling local password authentication for a user is not the same as disabling all access to that user--the user may still be able to login via other means (ssh key, kerberos, etc). Both the Linux shadow(5) and passwd(1) manuals are clear on this. Indeed it is a valid use case to have local accounts that are only accessible via sudo and that cannot be logged into with a password. Sudo 1.8.30 added an optional setting to check the shell of the target user (not the encrypted password!) against the contents of /etc/shells but that is not the same thing as preventing access to users with an invalid password hash

References

CVSS Scores

version 3.1