In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applicationsThere is no fixed version for Centos:9
kernel-64k-debug-modules-internal
.
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream kernel-64k-debug-modules-internal
package and not the kernel-64k-debug-modules-internal
package as distributed by Centos
.
See How to fix?
for Centos:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/core: Order the PMU list to fix warning about unordered pmu_ctx_list
Syskaller triggers a warning due to prev_epc->pmu != next_epc->pmu in perf_event_swap_task_ctx_data(). vmcore shows that two lists have the same perf_event_pmu_context, but not in the same order.
The problem is that the order of pmu_ctx_list for the parent is impacted by the time when an event/PMU is added. While the order for a child is impacted by the event order in the pinned_groups and flexible_groups. So the order of pmu_ctx_list in the parent and child may be different.
To fix this problem, insert the perf_event_pmu_context to its proper place after iteration of the pmu_ctx_list.
The follow testcase can trigger above warning:
test.c
void main() { int count = 0; pid_t pid;
printf("%d running\n", getpid()); sleep(30); printf("running\n");
pid = fork(); if (pid == -1) { printf("fork error\n"); return; } if (pid == 0) { while (1) { count++; } } else { while (1) { count++; } }
}
The testcase first opens an LBR event, so it will allocate task_ctx_data, and then open tracepoint and software events, so the parent context will have 3 different perf_event_pmu_contexts. On inheritance, child ctx will insert the perf_event_pmu_context in another order and the warning will trigger.
[ mingo: Tidied up the changelog. ]