Out-of-bounds Read Affecting kernel-rt-modules package, versions *
Threat Intelligence
The probability is the direct output of the EPSS model, and conveys an overall sense of the threat of exploitation in the wild. The percentile measures the EPSS probability relative to all known EPSS scores. Note: This data is updated daily, relying on the latest available EPSS model version. Check out the EPSS documentation for more details.
Do your applications use this vulnerable package?
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applications- Snyk IDSNYK-CENTOS9-KERNELRTMODULES-6314085
- published29 Feb 2024
- disclosed28 Feb 2024
Introduced: 28 Feb 2024
CVE-2021-47044 (opens in a new tab)How to fix?
There is no fixed version for Centos:9 kernel-rt-modules.
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream kernel-rt-modules package and not the kernel-rt-modules package as distributed by Centos.
See How to fix? for Centos:9 relevant fixed versions and status.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/fair: Fix shift-out-of-bounds in load_balance()
Syzbot reported a handful of occurrences where an sd->nr_balance_failed can grow to much higher values than one would expect.
A successful load_balance() resets it to 0; a failed one increments it. Once it gets to sd->cache_nice_tries + 3, this should trigger an active balance, which will either set it to sd->cache_nice_tries+1 or reset it to 0. However, in case the to-be-active-balanced task is not allowed to run on env->dst_cpu, then the increment is done without any further modification.
This could then be repeated ad nauseam, and would explain the absurdly high values reported by syzbot (86, 149). VincentG noted there is value in letting sd->cache_nice_tries grow, so the shift itself should be fixed. That means preventing:
""" If the value of the right operand is negative or is greater than or equal to the width of the promoted left operand, the behavior is undefined. """
Thus we need to cap the shift exponent to BITS_PER_TYPE(typeof(lefthand)) - 1.
I had a look around for other similar cases via coccinelle:
@expr@ position pos; expression E1; expression E2; @@ ( E1 >> E2@pos | E1 >> E2@pos )
@cst depends on expr@ position pos; expression expr.E1; constant cst; @@ ( E1 >> cst@pos | E1 << cst@pos )
@script:python depends on !cst@ pos << expr.pos; exp << expr.E2; @@
Dirty hack to ignore constexpr
if exp.upper() != exp: coccilib.report.print_report(pos[0], "Possible UB shift here")
The only other match in kernel/sched is rq_clock_thermal() which employs sched_thermal_decay_shift, and that exponent is already capped to 10, so that one is fine.
References
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-47044
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f3eab368e313dba35fc2f51ede778bf7b030b54
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/39a2a6eb5c9b66ea7c8055026303b3aa681b49a5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/805cea93e66ca7deaaf6ad3b67224ce47c104c2f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/80862cbf76c2646f709a57c4517aefe0b094c774