Information Exposure Affecting spark-3.5-scala-2.12-python package, versions *
Threat Intelligence
The probability is the direct output of the EPSS model, and conveys an overall sense of the threat of exploitation in the wild. The percentile measures the EPSS probability relative to all known EPSS scores. Note: This data is updated daily, relying on the latest available EPSS model version. Check out the EPSS documentation for more details.
Do your applications use this vulnerable package?
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applications- Snyk IDSNYK-MINIMOSLATEST-SPARK35SCALA212PYTHON-14102828
- published24 Nov 2025
- disclosed28 Jan 2025
Introduced: 28 Jan 2025
CVE-2024-23953 (opens in a new tab)How to fix?
There is no fixed version for Minimos:latest spark-3.5-scala-2.12-python.
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream spark-3.5-scala-2.12-python package and not the spark-3.5-scala-2.12-python package as distributed by Minimos.
See How to fix? for Minimos:latest relevant fixed versions and status.
Use of Arrays.equals() in LlapSignerImpl in Apache Hive to compare message signatures allows attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte. The attacker should be an authorized user of the product to perform this attack. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.0, which fixes this issue.
The problem occurs when an application doesn’t use a constant-time algorithm for validating a signature. The method Arrays.equals() returns false right away when it sees that one of the input’s bytes are different. It means that the comparison time depends on the contents of the arrays. This little thing may allow an attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte. So it might allow malicious users to submit splits/work with selected signatures to LLAP without running as a privileged user, potentially leading to DDoS attack.
More details in the reference section.
References
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23953
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p953-3j66-hg45
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/MINI-3fmj-m98c-m2ff
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2024-23953
- https://blog.gypsyengineer.com/en/security/preventing-timing-attacks-with-codeql.html
- https://cqr.company/web-vulnerabilities/timing-attacks/
- https://github.com/apache/hive
- https://github.com/apache/hive/commit/b418e3c9f479ba8e7d31e6470306111002ffa809
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-28030
- https://lists.apache.org/thread/0nloywj49nbtlc6l3c6363qvq7o1ztb7
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/28/3