Homepage

Integer Overflow or Wraparound The advisory has been revoked - it doesn't affect any version of package rtla  (opens in a new tab)

Threat Intelligence

EPSS
0.13% (3rd percentile)

Do your applications use this vulnerable package?

In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.

Test your applications
  • Snyk IDSNYK-RHEL10-RTLA-16546059
  • published1 Aug 2026
  • disclosed8 May 2026
Report a new vulnerability Found a mistake?

Introduced: 8 May 2026

CVE-2026-43368  (opens in a new tab)
CWE-190  (opens in a new tab)

Amendment

The Red Hat security team deemed this advisory irrelevant for RHEL:10.

NVD Description

Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream rtla package and not the rtla package as distributed by RHEL.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/i915: Fix potential overflow of shmem scatterlist length

When a scatterlists table of a GEM shmem object of size 4 GB or more is populated with pages allocated from a folio, unsigned int .length attribute of a scatterlist may get overflowed if total byte length of pages allocated to that single scatterlist happens to reach or cross the 4GB limit. As a consequence, users of the object may suffer from hitting unexpected, premature end of the object's backing pages.

[278.780187] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [278.780377] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2326 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mm.c:55 remap_sg+0x199/0x1d0 [i915] ... [278.780654] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2326 Comm: gem_mmap_offset Tainted: G S U 6.17.0-rc1-CI_DRM_16981-ged823aaa0607+ #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) [278.780656] Tainted: [S]=CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, [U]=USER [278.780658] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Meteor Lake Client Platform/MTL-P LP5x T3 RVP, BIOS MTLPFWI1.R00.3471.D91.2401310918 01/31/2024 [278.780659] RIP: 0010:remap_sg+0x199/0x1d0 [i915] ... [278.780786] Call Trace: [278.780787] <TASK> [278.780788] ? __apply_to_page_range+0x3e6/0x910 [278.780795] ? __pfx_remap_sg+0x10/0x10 [i915] [278.780906] apply_to_page_range+0x14/0x30 [278.780908] remap_io_sg+0x14d/0x260 [i915] [278.781013] vm_fault_cpu+0xd2/0x330 [i915] [278.781137] __do_fault+0x3a/0x1b0 [278.781140] do_fault+0x322/0x640 [278.781143] __handle_mm_fault+0x938/0xfd0 [278.781150] handle_mm_fault+0x12c/0x300 [278.781152] ? lock_mm_and_find_vma+0x4b/0x760 [278.781155] do_user_addr_fault+0x2d6/0x8e0 [278.781160] exc_page_fault+0x96/0x2c0 [278.781165] asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 ...

That issue was apprehended by the author of a change that introduced it, and potential risk even annotated with a comment, but then never addressed.

When adding folio pages to a scatterlist table, take care of byte length of any single scatterlist not exceeding max_segment.

(cherry picked from commit 06249b4e691a75694c014a61708c007fb5755f60)