Integer Overflow or Wraparound Affecting openssl package, versions *
Threat Intelligence
Do your applications use this vulnerable package?
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applications- Snyk ID SNYK-RHEL7-OPENSSL-1383232
- published 26 Jul 2021
- disclosed 6 Dec 2019
Introduced: 6 Dec 2019
CVE-2019-1551 Open this link in a new tabHow to fix?
There is no fixed version for RHEL:7
openssl
.
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by RHEL
.
See How to fix?
for RHEL:7
relevant fixed versions and status.
There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).
References
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/39
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/46
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=419102400a2811582a7a3d4a4e317d72e5ce0a8f
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=f1c5eea8a817075d31e43f5876993c6710238c98
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191210-0001/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20191206.txt
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2019-09
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2020-03
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2020-11
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-10
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-1551
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4594
- https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4855
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DDHOAATPWJCXRNFMJ2SASDBBNU5RJONY/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EXDDAOWSAIEFQNBHWYE6PPYFV4QXGMCD/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XVEP3LAK4JSPRXFO4QF4GG2IVXADV3SO/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202004-10
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155754/Slackware-Security-Advisory-openssl-Updates.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4514
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00030.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4376-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4504-1/
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=419102400a2811582a7a3d4a4e317d72e5ce0a8f
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f1c5eea8a817075d31e43f5876993c6710238c98
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00023.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DDHOAATPWJCXRNFMJ2SASDBBNU5RJONY/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EXDDAOWSAIEFQNBHWYE6PPYFV4QXGMCD/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XVEP3LAK4JSPRXFO4QF4GG2IVXADV3SO/