Resource Leak Affecting kernel-64k-modules package, versions <0:5.14.0-503.11.1.el9_5
Threat Intelligence
The probability is the direct output of the EPSS model, and conveys an overall sense of the threat of exploitation in the wild. The percentile measures the EPSS probability relative to all known EPSS scores. Note: This data is updated daily, relying on the latest available EPSS model version. Check out the EPSS documentation for more details.
Do your applications use this vulnerable package?
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applications- Snyk IDSNYK-RHEL9-KERNEL64KMODULES-7793290
- published22 Aug 2024
- disclosed21 Aug 2024
Introduced: 21 Aug 2024
CVE-2024-43869 (opens in a new tab)How to fix?
Upgrade RHEL:9 kernel-64k-modules to version 0:5.14.0-503.11.1.el9_5 or higher.
This issue was patched in RHSA-2024:9315.
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream kernel-64k-modules package and not the kernel-64k-modules package as distributed by RHEL.
See How to fix? for RHEL:9 relevant fixed versions and status.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release
The perf pending task work is never waited upon the matching event release. In the case of a child event, released via free_event() directly, this can potentially result in a leaked event, such as in the following scenario that doesn't even require a weak IRQ work implementation to trigger:
schedule() prepare_task_switch() =======> <NMI> perf_event_overflow() event->pending_sigtrap = ... irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq) <======= </NMI> perf_event_task_sched_out() event_sched_out() event->pending_sigtrap = 0; atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&event->refcount) task_work_add(&event->pending_task) finish_lock_switch() =======> <IRQ> perf_pending_irq() //do nothing, rely on pending task work <======= </IRQ>
begin_new_exec() perf_event_exit_task() perf_event_exit_event() // If is child event free_event() WARN(atomic_long_cmpxchg(&event->refcount, 1, 0) != 1) // event is leaked
Similar scenarios can also happen with perf_event_remove_on_exec() or simply against concurrent perf_event_release().
Fix this with synchonizing against the possibly remaining pending task work while freeing the event, just like is done with remaining pending IRQ work. This means that the pending task callback neither need nor should hold a reference to the event, preventing it from ever beeing freed.
References
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-43869
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/104e258a004037bc7dba9f6085c71dad6af57ad4
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a5465418f5fd970e86a86c7f4075be262682840
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ad46f1fef421d43cdab3a7d1744b2f43b54dae0
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed2c202dac55423a52d7e2290f2888bf08b8ee99
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f34d8307a73a18de5320fcc6f40403146d061891