Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Affecting lucene-solr package, versions *
Threat Intelligence
Exploit maturity not defined.
The probability is the direct output of the EPSS model, and conveys an overall sense of the threat of exploitation in the wild. The percentile measures the EPSS probability relative to all known EPSS scores. Note: This data is updated daily, relying on the latest available EPSS model version. Check out the EPSS documentation for more details.
Do your applications use this vulnerable package?
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applicationsSnyk Learn
Learn about Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in an interactive lesson.
Start learning- Snyk IDSNYK-DEBIAN8-LUCENESOLR-337132
- published13 Feb 2019
- disclosed8 Mar 2019
Introduced: 13 Feb 2019
CVE-2017-3164 (opens in a new tab)How to fix?
There is no fixed version for Debian:8 lucene-solr.
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream lucene-solr package and not the lucene-solr package as distributed by Debian.
See How to fix? for Debian:8 relevant fixed versions and status.
Server Side Request Forgery in Apache Solr, versions 1.3 until 7.6 (inclusive). Since the "shards" parameter does not have a corresponding whitelist mechanism, a remote attacker with access to the server could make Solr perform an HTTP GET request to any reachable URL.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-3164
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/43026507844ada1ac658ccf7bc939378c13e492fd6538416ce65df39@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/75dc651478f9d04505b46d44fe3ac739e7aaf3d7bf1257973685f8f7@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ca3105b6934ccd28e843dffe39724f6963ff49825e9b709837203649@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e0f9c652b57a91fdcc287efcead620af9f4d8e46b88f0b761aa265de@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html
- http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-announce/201902.mbox/%3CCAECwjAVjBN%3DwO5rYs6ktAX-5%3D-f5JDFwbbTSM2TTjEbGO5jKKA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bcce5a9c532b386c68dab2f6b3ce8b0cc9b950ec551766e76391caa3@%3Ccommits.nifi.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc400db37710ee79378b6c52de3640493ff538c2beb41cefdbbdf2ab8@%3Ccommits.submarine.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rca37935d661f4689cb4119f1b3b224413b22be161b678e6e6ce0c69b@%3Ccommits.nifi.apache.org%3E
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190327-0003/
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107026
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2017-3164
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/43026507844ada1ac658ccf7bc939378c13e492fd6538416ce65df39%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/75dc651478f9d04505b46d44fe3ac739e7aaf3d7bf1257973685f8f7%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bcce5a9c532b386c68dab2f6b3ce8b0cc9b950ec551766e76391caa3%40%3Ccommits.nifi.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ca3105b6934ccd28e843dffe39724f6963ff49825e9b709837203649%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e0f9c652b57a91fdcc287efcead620af9f4d8e46b88f0b761aa265de%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc400db37710ee79378b6c52de3640493ff538c2beb41cefdbbdf2ab8%40%3Ccommits.submarine.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rca37935d661f4689cb4119f1b3b224413b22be161b678e6e6ce0c69b%40%3Ccommits.nifi.apache.org%3E