In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applicationsLearn about Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in an interactive lesson.
Start learningUpgrade org.webjars.npm:dompurify to version 3.4.16 or higher.
org.webjars.npm:dompurify is a DOM-only XSS sanitizer for HTML, MathML and SVG.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in _sanitizeElements and _sanitizeAttributes in src/purify.ts, which invoke _handleHookDetachedNode only after the beforeSanitizeElements and uponSanitizeElement hooks, so a non-root node removed by an afterSanitizeElements or afterSanitizeAttributes hook keeps its descendants' event handlers armed, and the post-walk neutralization pass covers only entries in DOMPurify.removed, which excludes hook-detached nodes. An attacker can execute script in the page origin under the victim's session by supplying markup with a non-root wrapper whose descendants carry on* handlers, such as an <img onerror>, so a queued resource event fires on the detached subtree after the synchronous sanitize() call has returned. This requires the application to call sanitize() with IN_PLACE: true on a live node and to register a node-removing afterSanitizeElements or afterSanitizeAttributes hook, so callers using the default returning mode or no such hooks are unaffected.
Note: This is a bypass of the fix for the vulnerability described in CVE-2026-75838.
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
?, &, /, <, > and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents.