The probability is the direct output of the EPSS model, and conveys an overall sense of the threat of exploitation in the wild. The percentile measures the EPSS probability relative to all known EPSS scores. Note: This data is updated daily, relying on the latest available EPSS model version. Check out the EPSS documentation for more details.
In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.
Test your applicationsLearn about Unsafe Query Generation vulnerabilities in an interactive lesson.
Start learningActiveRecord is the Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) that comes out-of-the-box with Rails. It plays the role of Model in the MVC architecture employed by Rails.
There is a vulnerability when ActiveRecord is used in conjunction with JSON parameter parsing.
This vulnerability is similar to CVE-2012-2660, CVE-2012-2694 and CVE-2013-0155.
Due to the way ActiveRecord interprets parameters in combination with the way that JSON parameters are parsed, it is possible for an attacker to issue unexpected database queries with IS NULL
or empty WHERE
clauses. This issue does not let an attacker insert arbitrary values into an SQL query, however they can cause the query to check for NULL
or eliminate a WHERE
clause when most users wouldn't expect it.
For example, a system has password reset with token functionality:
unless params[:token].nil?
user = User.find_by_token(params[:token])
user.reset_password!
end
An attacker can craft a request such that params[:token]
will return [nil]
. The [nil]
value will bypass the test for nil, but will still add an IN ('xyz', NULL)
clause to the SQL query.
Similarly, an attacker can craft a request such that params[:token]
will return an empty hash. An empty hash will eliminate the WHERE clause of the query, but can bypass the nil?
check.
Note that this impacts not only dynamic finders (find_by_*
) but also relations (User.where(:name => params[:name])
).