CVE-2024-58237 Affecting ocfs2-kmp-default package, versions <6.4.0-150700.53.6.1


Severity

Recommended
0.0
medium
0
10

Based on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server security rating.

Threat Intelligence

EPSS
0.03% (6th percentile)

Do your applications use this vulnerable package?

In a few clicks we can analyze your entire application and see what components are vulnerable in your application, and suggest you quick fixes.

Test your applications
  • Snyk IDSNYK-SLES157-OCFS2KMPDEFAULT-10744344
  • published15 Jul 2025
  • disclosed14 Jul 2025

Introduced: 14 Jul 2025

NewCVE-2024-58237  (opens in a new tab)

How to fix?

Upgrade SLES:15.7 ocfs2-kmp-default to version 6.4.0-150700.53.6.1 or higher.

NVD Description

Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream ocfs2-kmp-default package and not the ocfs2-kmp-default package as distributed by SLES. See How to fix? for SLES:15.7 relevant fixed versions and status.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers

Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call invalidates packet pointers.

Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for global sub-programs, such that the following program could be rejected:

int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
    bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &amp;jmp_table, 0);
    return 0;
}

SEC(&#34;tc&#34;) int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk) { int *p = (void *)(long)sk-&gt;data; ... make p valid ... tail_call(sk); p = 42; / this is unsafe */ ... }

The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.

CVSS Base Scores

version 3.1